Is Quiet Quitting A Form of Labor Action?
What’s worse than being a “quitter”?
Well, if you ask aggressively motivated people around the internet (seriously, don’t go there), it’s being the type of quitter who sneaks out the back door after leaving work at 5:00 sharp.
Yep, that’s right: The worst of the worst kind of quitter you can be is a quiet quitter.
The irony is that the term “quiet quitting” doesn’t even apply to actual quitters.
As it’s popularly used, the term describes the New Normal phenomenon of people who show up to work - do only what’s within their job description - and go home again, leaving work at work.
But with burnout on the rise, is quiet quitting really such a bad thing? What if quiet quitting is a coping mechanism for sky-high stress, or a form of labor action disguised as a viral trend?
As it turns out, this behavior is quite similar to a historic form of labor action known as work-to-rule.
In this article, read about the similarities and differences between quiet quitting and work-to-rule - and decide for yourself whether the viral trend is the beginning of a new type of labor action.
What Is Quiet Quitting?
During the pandemic, the phenomenon of "quiet quitting" emerged as a mass-coping mechanism for the office closures and stressful conditions of working from home. Instead of formally quitting, some folks just quietly drifted away from their work. This phenomenon persists today, and it's not great for companies. Employees are still less productive than before the pandemic, and in combination with an unpredictable economy, companies are cracking down with policies to get workers to show up and perform.
From a management perspective, the core underlying issues associated with quiet quitting are retention strategies, organizational flexibility, and the overall workplace atmosphere or culture.
Examples of Quiet Quitting
So what does quiet-quitting look like in day-to-day worklife? Here are some practical examples:
A decline in proactive collaboration: When employees start quietly quitting, they become less inclined to initiate discussions, share ideas, or assist colleagues.
Decrease in the quality and quantity of work: When employees become demotivated and start to disengage, their work quality decreases and they struggle to meet deadlines.
Increased absenteeism: Quiet quitting involves taking frequent sick days or personal leave without valid reasons, signaling disengagement and withdrawal.
Loss of passion for the job: Employees may lack energy or motivation when performing tasks. It can have various consequences, such as decreased productivity, poor quality work, and a negative impact on team morale
Disengagement for workplace culture: Workers might skip team meetings or social gatherings, indicating a growing disconnection from the organization.
Reduced interaction with managers: Employees who leave their jobs quietly sometimes avoid talking to their managers, which can create communication problems. They might stay away from one-on-one meetings, performance reviews, or feedback sessions. This can cause misunderstandings and make it harder for employees and their managers to work together well.
Disinterest in career advancement opportunities: Employees who quietly quit may show a lack of interest in career advancement opportunities, such as promotions, lateral moves, or new job assignments. This disinterest could indicate a sense of resignation or apathy towards their career growth and development within the organization.
Employers and managers can prevent team disengagement by being aware of this everyday issue. To achieve this, they can employ strategies such as promoting open communication and creating professional development and connection opportunities. These measures can help reduce the risk of quitting.
Quiet Quitting vs Peaceful Protest
Is quiet quitting a form of peaceful protest? The short answer is yes, and no. When employees are unhappy with workplace conditions but are unwilling to leave the job, quiet quitting and peaceful protest are two distinct paths of action.
Both methods involve resisting the status quo, but they differ significantly in their objectives and strategies. Quiet quitting involves employees distancing themselves from their responsibilities without expressing disapproval explicitly. This usually happens as a result of personal dissatisfaction or job-related frustration.
On the other hand, peaceful protest aims to draw attention to specific injustices or grievances by organizing deliberate actions like boycotts, strikes, or demonstrations. While quiet quitting may lead to similar workplace outcomes in the short term, such as reduced productivity or low morale, it is typically driven by individual reasons rather than a collective desire for change.
Quiet quitting is typically a solo effort, and often involves the intention to stay under the radar while leadership continues business as usual. In contrast, peaceful protests are a historic example of coordinated efforts by unions or groups to advocate for systemic change in the workplace or society. They usually draw attention to employees.
Work-to-Rule
Work-to-rule is another strategy that employees have historically used to protest against poor working conditions or management decisions. During a work-to-rule action, employees limit their work to the minimum tasks required by their job description and strictly follow the rules and guidelines outlined in their employment contract. By disrupting normal operations, protesters draw attention to the injustice while remaining within their employment agreements. It is commonly used in workplace cultures where toxic productivity and lack of rights are prevalent.
Collective Action
Collective action refers to coordinated efforts by a group of workers to achieve common goals or address shared injustices. This can take various forms, including organized protests, strikes, boycotts, or advocacy campaigns, where individuals come together to leverage their collective power and influence for social or political change.
Unlike individual forms of protest, collective action involves solidarity and collaboration among participants. It often aims to challenge existing power structures or address systemic issues within the workplace culture or society. While collective action can be disruptive and confrontational, it is grounded in the belief that collective efforts are more effective than individual actions in bringing about meaningful change.
What Companies Can Do to Support Employee Wellbeing
Workers who work remotely must balance personal and professional objectives while navigating a rapidly changing labor market. By supporting authentic self-care practices, organizations can help employees focus on their well-being and resilience, leading to a healthier and more engaged workforce.
To counter the rising tide of burnout, organizations need to create a supportive environment for workers by offering concrete resources and support for mental health, stress management, and work-life balance. This can include flexible work arrangements, wellness programs, open communication, and consistent messaging that breaks down stigmas surrounding mental health. Employers who recognize the importance of supporting the wellbeing of workers can prevent employees from quietly quitting - and build healthier workplace culture in the process.
Are You Really Burnt Out, or Just… A Quitter?
In workplaces with a toxic focus on productivity, “quiet quitting” can be a coping mechanism for workers who want to stay in the job, but aren’t willing to (or can’t) sacrifice wellbeing to meet workplace expectations. While the symptoms of “quiet quitting” may appear as simple dis-engagement, the issues typically run deeper than individual motivation.
The conditions that cause workers to view “quiet quitting” as their best option is the result of systemic factors. Labeling burnt-out workers as "quiet quitters" neglects the broader issues at hand.
To effectively address quiet quitting in a workplace setting, leaders need to address the persistent issue of workplace burnout - including why it disproportionately affects women - with a multi-faceted approach that acknowledges both personal and organizational factors.
Employers should implement policies and initiatives prioritizing employee well-being, including flexible work arrangements, paid parental leave, wellness programs, and mental health resources. By taking these proactive steps and holding an open dialogue with workers, organizations can create a culture that values the health and happiness of workers - and roots out the underlying cause of quiet quitting, for good.
You May Also Like: Is "Monk Mode" Still Relevant for Productivity?
Signs of Workplace Burnout
Signs of workplace burnout can manifest in various ways, affecting both mental and physical well-being. Recognizing these signs early on is essential for addressing burnout and promoting employee well-being in the workplace. As outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO), these signs include:
Feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion
Increased mental distance from one's job or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to work
Reduced professional efficacy or productivity
Physical symptoms such as headaches, muscle tension, or gastrointestinal issues
Difficulty concentrating or making decisions
Signs of Quiet Quitting
Signs of quiet quitting involve subtle changes in behavior and engagement at work. These may include:
Decreased participation in meetings or team activities
Reduced initiative-taking and proactive engagement
Increased absenteeism or unexplained absences
Loss of enthusiasm and passion for the job
Deteriorating relationships with colleague
Avoidance of challenging tasks or responsibilities
Minimal contribution to group projects or collaborative efforts
Lack of interest in professional development opportunities
Decreased responsiveness to feedback or coaching